Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Sandstrom

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 29, 1992No. 77773PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

609 So.2d 583 (1992)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Ray SANDSTROM, Respondent.

No. 77773.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 29, 1992.

Rehearing Denied January 5, 1993.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and David M. Barnovitz, Bar Counsel, Ft. Lauderdale, for complainant.

Kayo E. Morgan, Ft. Lauderdale, for respondent.

2Per curiam

Ray Sandstrom petitions for review of the findings of fact, recommendations regarding guilt and sanctions, and statement of costs contained in a referee's report filed against him. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Hallman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. The Florida Bar v. WagnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1968

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of WolframArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. The Florida Bar v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Florida Bar v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Matter of WolframArizona Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API