Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Rose

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 27, 2002No. SC00-1792PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

823 So.2d 727 (2002)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Brent Allan ROSE, Respondent.

No. SC00-1792.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 27, 2002.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, FL; and Thomas E. DeBerg, Assistant Staff Counsel, Tampa, FL, for Complainant.

Scott T. Orsini of Orsini & Rose Law Firm, P.A., St. Petersburg, FL, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review a referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by Brent Allan Rose. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The Florida Bar filed a complaint against Brent Allan Rose…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. Matter of WolframArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Jennings v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. The Florida Bar v. VernellSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  5. The Florida Bar v. SandstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. The Florida Bar v. SpearSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  3. Florida Bar v. KavanaughSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  5. The Florida Bar v. AbramsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API