Legal Opinion

Liborio II, L.P. v. Artesian Water Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided July 9, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 91A-10-13Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HERLIHY, Judge.

Appellee Artesian Water Company, Inc. [Artesian] has moved to dismiss this appeal for failure of Liborio II, L.P., Lenape Development, Inc. and Liborio III, L.P. [appellants] to join a necessary party.

Appellants have appealed a decision of the Public Service Commission [PSC]. Artesian argues that Superior Court Civil Rule 19(a) requires appellants to have added the PSC as a party and its failure to do so mandates dismissal of this appeal. Therefore, the issue is whether the PSC is a necessary party.

BACKGROUND

Appellants originally sued Artesian for damages in this Court.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Application of Wilmington Suburban Water Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. Zoning Board of Adjustment v. Dragon Run Terrace, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  3. Nepi v. LammotSuperior Court of Delaware · 1959
  4. Lindsay v. Beaver Brook Section One Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  5. Simpson v. KennedySuperior Court of Delaware · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API