Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Kennedy
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided September 18, 1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STIFTEL, President Judge.
Appellants, Marvin E. Simpson and Kentwoods Mobile Estates, Inc. [hereinafter “Kentwoods”] do not wish to produce certain documents and do not want to answer interrogatories and thus seek protective orders (Sup.Ct. Rule 26, Del.C.Ann.) in their defense against the State Human Relations Commission’s claim of race discrimination in the operation of appellants’ trailer park.
The facts are essentially as follows:
On June 26, 1972, Reginald Kennedy, ap-pellee herein, filed a complaint with the State Human Relations Commission [hereinafter “Commission”] alleging…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. Concord CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- B'd of Adj'm't of City of Ft. Worth v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Jones v. Haridor Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Pennsylvania State Athletic Commission v. BrattonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cebrick v. PeakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Anchorage v. McCabeAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Anchorage v. McCabeAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Liborio II, L.P. v. Artesian Water Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1992