Legal Opinion

Keane v. Liebler

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 29, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourteenth District. Action by James Keane against Theodore A. Liebler and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Reversed, and new trial ordered.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

There must be a retrial, for the reason that the judgment rendered is not consistent with any aspect of the case. The plaintiff, an actor in one of the defendants’ theatrical companies, sues to recover $140, of which $70 represents his agreed salary for the week ending Saturday April 20th, and $70 is for damages resulting for an alleged wrongful discharge. The defendants interposed a general denial and a counterclaim of $250 for damages caused by plaintiff’s misconduct during the performance on the night of April 20th.

In September, 1906, the defendants employed the plaintiff to perform a role…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turner v. . KouwenhovenNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Walsh v. New York & Kentucky Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Seaburn v. ZachmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weed v. Idaho Copper Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API