Legal Opinion

In re Christin

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 4, 1943No. Nos. 38043-M, 39848-HPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, District Judge.

These are reviews of orders of the conciliation commissioner dated August 27, 1942, denying motions of petitioner on review.

The same interests being involved in each above-entitled matter, these findings, rulings and orders relate to both debtor estates. For the purposes of brevity, Estelle C. Porter Christin will be referred to as the “Debtor,” Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles as the “Bank,” and the La Cienega Ranching Company as the “Company.”

The record discloses that the Debtor was bona fide engaged in agricultural pursuits, operating approximately 164…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re FaersteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  2. In Re FullagarDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1934
  3. Donald v. Bankers Life Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  4. Patents Process, Inc. v. DurstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  5. Grande v. Arizona Wax Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  2. In re N. H. Development Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1945
  3. In re N. H. Development Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API