Legal Opinion

Leisenring v. Harrison

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1931No. Appeal 181PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion- by

Stadtpeed, J.,

This case comes before this court on an appeal by plaintiff from the refusal of the court below to enter judgment n. o. v. in favor of plaintiff on a directed verdict in favor of defendant in an action of assumpsit. The right to a recovery by plaintiff depends on the construction of a written agreement between plaintiff’s testator and the defendant.

The agreement, dated October 9, 1920, recites that Harrison, the defendant, is an applicant for TJ. S. letters patent for improvements in marine mines, etc., which inventions are expected to prove valuable by reason of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seeman v. Philadelphia Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. William F. Mosser Co. v. Cherry River Boom & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Koch v. County of SchuylkillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. MacK Paving & Construction Co. v. American Pipe & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. General American Life Ins. Co. v. HamorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API