Legal Opinion

William F. Mosser Co. v. Cherry River Boom & Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1927No. Appeal, 179PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

This action of the William F. Mosser Company, for the use of the assignee of its rights, is based on a contract entered into with the Cherry River Boom & Lumber Company, defendant. The former purchased from the latter bark for use in its tanneries, and had, in 1902, agreed to buy all produced from certain lands at a fixed price. In 1908 additional property was acquired by defendant, which it desired to develop, and it then agreed to cut and sell all of the hemlock bark from the designated tract at a fixed price per ton. It undertook to deliver not less than 10,000…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Nunez v. DautelSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Keller v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Alexander v. RighterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Crossgrove v. HimmelrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tulsa Opera House Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Schenley Farms Co. v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Commercial Coal Mining Co. v. Big Bend Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. B. J. Carney & Co. v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Harrison's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API