Russel v. Rosenbaum Bros.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Field, J. cited: Van Valen v. Lapham, 13 How. Pr., 240. Kay v. Noll, 20 Neb., 380. A. & N. R. R. v. Miller, 16 Id., 661. Rosenbaum Brothers, cited: Taylor v. Bates, 5 Cow., 376. Wood v. Berry, 1 Barb., 114. Rudolf v. Winters, 7 Neb., 128. Hobble v. Zaepjfel, 17 Id., 536. Collins v. Blantern, 2 Wils., 347. Oseanyan v. Arms Co., 103 U. S., 261.
1Opinion of the Court
Reese, Ch. J.
The original action was brought in the district court of Lancaster county by plaintiff against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company to recover certain overcharges of freight, or rebates.
*771The principal allegations of the petition were, that on and prior to the date named McLure & Griffin were engaged in buying and shipping grain from Elk Creek to ■Chicago; that the charges of the railroad company .for the transportation of grain over its lines was thirty cents per hundred pounds, but the agreement was that when McLure ■& Griffin should present to the officers of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brooks v. DutcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hewitt v. EisenbartNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- C. Aultman & Co. v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Rosenbaum Bros. v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1892