Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. Eisenbart

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1893No. 4922PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from the district court of Saline county. Tried below before Morris, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This action was begun by defendant in error against plaintiff in error to recover damages on account of the alleged'negligent and unskillful setting, dressing, and caring for a broken leg of defendant in error by plaintiff in error, a physician and surgeon. The answer admitted the treatment of the broken leg, but denied negligence and want of skill, and alleged that any injury sustained by defendant in error was due to his own negligence and disobedience of plaintiff in error’s instructions. This the reply denied. A verdict was found and judgment rendered for defendant in error.

It…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carthage Turnpike Co. v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Elliott v. Van BurenMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Eckles v. BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  4. Homan v. Steele, Johnson & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Russel v. Rosenbaum Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Sim v. WeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Chas. T. Derr Construction Co. v. GelruthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Malila v. MeachamOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. CholletteNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API