Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 29, 1948No. 34,688PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from orders sustaining demurrers to his complaint.

The action is brought against the county of Sherburne, the several county commissioners as individuals, and Walter George, an employe of the county.

County aid road No. 48 lies within the town of Palmer in defendant county. The complaint alleges in substance that this road was originally a town road; that prior to September 14, 1946, “the Town Board of Palmer had duly offered and tendered to the defendant, * * * the control, care and maintenance of certain roads * * * including said County Aid Road No. 48, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Snider v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Ackeret v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Dosdall v. County of OlmstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  5. Gullikson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hoffert v. Owatonna Inn Towne Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Susla v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Dunn v. SchmidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Mace v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API