Gullikson v. McDonald
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant village of Ada from an order of the district court for Norman county, Ives, J., overruling its demurrer, to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
The defendant, the village of Ada, demurred to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This is an appeal by it from an order overruling the demurrer.
The complaint alleges that said village is, and on January 2(5, 1895, was, a municipal corporation, and prior thereto caused to be erected a village prison or lockup, in which it required persons under arrest to be detained and imprisoned; that said building was open, cold, and wholly unfit to be used as a' lockup in the winter season, or to detain any person in during cold weather;…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Snider v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Dosdall v. County of OlmstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
3Cited by27 opinions
- City of Winona v. BotzetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Emmons v. City of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Wilcox v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Gray v. Mayor of GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Ackeret v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.