Legal Opinion

Terre Haute Malleable & Manufacturing Co. v. Wehrle

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1921No. 11,183PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Proceedings for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by William Wehrle against the Terre Haute Malleable and Manufacturing Company. From an award for applicant, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDausman, J.

Two contentions are presented by the appellant: (1) That there is no evidence to support the finding that the employe received a personal injury by an accident; and (2) that the employer had personal knowledge of the injury at the time the injury was received.

The first contention is based on the proposition that to bring a case within the statute two separate and distinct things must exist, viz: an accident and an injury —the accident being the cause and the injury the re-*657suit. Counsel insist that these two things must not be confused. The record discloses that , the injury for which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Indian Creek Coal & Mining Co. v. CalvertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Hornbrook-Price Co. v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. GriggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Heflin v. Red Front Cash & Carry Stores, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Brown's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
  4. The Studebaker Corp. v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Patterson Transfer Co. v. LewisTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API