Legal Opinion

Ruberoid Co. v. Patterson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1941No. Appeal, 168Published

1Opinion of the Court

Stadteeld, J.,

Opinion by

This is an action in assumpsit for goods sold and delivered pursuant to a sales contract of June 1, 1939.

Plaintiff’s statement of claim and amendments thereto averred that the defendants, W. Graham Patterson, John P. Cronin, Arnold V. Hilquist and A. M. Breckenridge, were partners doing business as the Pittsburgh House Insulating Company; that Hilquist, acting for and on behalf of himself and the other defendants within the scope of the partnership business, entered into an oral contract with the plaintiff company for the sale and purchase of certain merchandise in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dinger v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Robinson v. FloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Man v. WarnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  4. Newcomet v. BrotzmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API