Legal Opinion

Farley v. Booth Bros. Land & Livestock Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1995No. 94-343PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

This is an appeal from a Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Rosebud County, Memorandum and Opinion as well as Supplemental Memorandum and Opinion, concluding that Western Energy Company (Western) should be making its payments under the leases at issue, to Booth Brothers Land and Livestock Company (Booth). We affirm.

ISSUES

The following are issues on appeal:

I. Is scoria a mineral for the purposes of deciding the present action?

II. Is Farley entitled to the compensation payable by Western for the use of the surface?

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The parties have stipulated to an agreed statement of facts.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heinatz v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Goodover v. Lindey's Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. Royal Mineral Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Holland v. Dolese CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Miller Land & Mineral Co. v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Murray v. BEJ Minerals, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. River Springs Limited Liability Company v. COUNTY COM'RS OF TETONWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Caldwell v. SaboMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Hart v. CraigMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Mary Murray v. Bej Minerals, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API