Legal Opinion
Olson v. Blaeser
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 19, 1990No. C8-90-121PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant Kevin R. Olson commenced this dramshop action against respondents City of Fifty Lakes and City of Fifty Lakes Municipal Liquor Store (the city) to recover damages for injuries he suffered in an auto accident. The trial court granted summary judgment for the city based on appellant’s failure to comply with the 120-day notice of claim provision of Minn.Stat. § 340A.802, subd. 2. Appellant contends that the city had actual notice of his claim within the 120-day period. Alternatively, he argues the notice of claim provision violates the equal protection clauses of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Wegan v. Village of LexingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wallin v. LetourneauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Oslund v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997