Legal Opinion
Fred R. Comb Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 5, 1945No. 45218PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaddeN, Judge
In April 1935, the plaintiff made a contract to build for the Government certain buildings and facilities in South Dakota. The plaintiff started the work, but on July 29,1935, was ordered by the Government to suspend operations because a Federal District Court had enjoined the continuance of the work for the reason that the Government had “failed to secure adequate property rights in the land upon which the work was to be done.” After forty days the plaintiff was given permission to proceed with the work. It then *183took the plaintiff nine Says to reorganize the work and resume it. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brand Inv. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
3Cited by23 opinions
- Community Heating & Plumbing Company, Inc. v. Admiral Frank B. Kelso, Ii, Acting Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- James A. Boyajian, Assignee of Triumph Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Interstate General Government Contractors, Inc. v. Togo West, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Capital Electric Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.