Legal Opinion

United States v. Forslund

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 31, 1958No. 11,584PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The accused was convicted of violating Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934, by wrongfully using morphine,

*9The question before this Court concerns the admissibility in evidence of the results of tests performed on urine specimens furnished by the accused pursuant to an order of his superior officer.

The order came about in the following manner: The accused was apprehended as a suspected user of narcotics. The Office of Special Investigations agent questioned him and asked him to supply a urine specimen. The accused replied that he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. United States v. EggersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. MinnifieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. JordanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robert A. Walters v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Antonio A. Giles, Jr. v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Walters v. Secretary of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
  4. Giles v. Secretary of the ArmyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
  5. United States v. McClungUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API