Legal Opinion
Giles v. Secretary of the Army
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 23, 1979No. Civ. A. 77-0904PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge:
In this proceeding a former United States Army enlistee seeks an interpretation of the scope of a 1974 Court of Military Appeals decision involving orders to compel urinalyses as part of an Army drug rehabilitation program. That decision, United States v. Ruiz, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 181, 48 C.M.R. 797 (1974), invalidated an order compelling a urinalysis where the test results, if positive, were intended for use in an administrative discharge proceeding 1 in which the service-member could be issued a less than fully honorable discharge. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Robert O. Bland v. John D. Connally, Secretary of the Navy, and IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Bertram Zweibon v. John N. Mitchell, Individually and as Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Joseph De Luca v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robert A. Walters v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Antonio A. Giles, Jr. v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Walters v. Secretary of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
- Thomas B. Roelofs v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Thomas B. Roelofs v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980