Legal Opinion

Duckwall v. Rees

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1949No. 17,782PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

Upon consideration of the appellees’ petition for a rehearing we have concluded to recall our initial opinion herein, filed March 14, 1949, and substitute the following therefor.

All appellees named in the caption hereof, except Ray A. Rees and Cloa Young, are nominal parties to this appeal and our use of the word “appellees” hereinafter will be understood to refer to said Rees and Young only.

At the instance of the appellees the Tipton Circuit Court decreed the specific performance of an executory contract for the sale of certain real estate in Noblesville, Indiana, in which contract the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bauermeister v. SullivanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Barry Stuart Udell, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of the Standard Carpetland Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Samuel W. Fletcher and Charlotte D. Fletcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  3. Udell v. Standard Carpetland USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  4. Gomez v. Chua Medical Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Matter of UdellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API