Legal Opinion

Matter of Udell

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided September 17, 1992No. 19-20371PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

ROBERT E. GRANT, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter is before the court on a motion for relief from stay, filed on behalf of Carpetland, USA. Carpetland argues that “cause” exists to terminate the automatic stay, pursuant to § 362(d)(1), to allow it to enforce a preliminary injunction entered by the Allen Superior Court against the debtor.

The burden of proof on a motion for relief from stay is a shifting one. The moving creditor must initially make a pri-ma facie case that cause exists to lift or modify the stay. Having successfully done so, the burden then shifts to the debtor to show that…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. In Re Sonnax Industries, Inc., Debtor. Sonnax Industries, Inc. v. Tri Component Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Barry Stuart Udell, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of the Standard Carpetland Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. In Re KilpatrickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  3. Udell v. Standard Carpetland USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  4. In Re Petroleum Piping Contractors, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
  5. Enodis Corp. v. Wausau Ins. Co. (In Re Consolidated Industries Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API