Legal Opinion
Albert Levine Associates v. Bertoni & Cotti
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 21, 1970No. 68 Civ. 4238PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOPER, District Judge.
Defendants, Shaul Equipment and Supply Co., Inc. (hereinafter “Shaul”), George Holder (President of Shaul), and Lester W. Ginanni (General Manager and Ass’t. Treasurer of Shaul) move pursuant to Rule 12(b) F.R.Civ.P. to quash service of process .and dismiss the pending action brought under § 4 and § 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15, 26.
Plaintiff, “a co-partnership doing business in New York” claims that it was engaged in the business of importing and selling of replacement parts for crawler tractors to various distributors throughout the United States. It…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Piedmont Label Company v. Sun Garden Packing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Honda Associates, Inc. v. Nozawa Trading, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Grappone, Inc. v. Subaru of America, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1975
- California Clippers, Inc. v. United States Soccer Football Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.