Legal Opinion
Tomtom, Inc. v. Adolph
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 19, 2015No. 2014-1699PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACH, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Dr. Michael Adolph appeals the claim construction of several terms of U.S. Patent No. 6,356,836 (“the '836 patent”), for which he is the inventor, by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. For the reasons set forth below, this court reverses and remands.
Baokground
I. The '836 Patent
The '836 patent describes “[a] method and device for generating, merging and updating data” that can then be used to provide a mobile unit with current, and continuously updated, accurate road network, route, and traffic information. '836 patent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Simo Holdings Inc. v. Hong Kong Ucloudlink NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Frac Shack Inc. v. Fuel Automation Station, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- ICM Controls Corp. v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2017
- Blue Calypso, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2015
- Coconut Grove Pads, Inc. v. Mich & Mich TGR, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.