Legal Opinion

Kumar v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 28, 2021No. 21/21Published

1Opinion of the Court

Amit Kumar v. State of Maryland, No. 21, September Term, 2021 VOIR DIRE – APPLICABILITY OF HOLDING TO PENDING CASES – PRESERVATION FOR APPELLATE REVIEW – Court of Appeals held that holding in Kazadi v. State, 467 Md. 1, 9, 47,

223 A.3d 554, 559, 581

(2020)—that, on request, during voir dire, trial court must ask whether prospective jurors are unwilling or unable to comply with jury instructions on certain fundamental principles and that Kazadi applied to any other cases pending on direct appeal when opinion was filed where relevant question was preserved for appellate review—applies to any case…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Sergeant Co. v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API