Legal Opinion
McKay v. Boise Project Board of Control
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 2005No. 28660PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION. THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED JULY 22, 2004, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN.
BURDICK, Justice.
L. Darwin and Patricia McKay (McKay) and their company, the Turf Company, LLC, brought this action after incurring a crop loss resulting from the flooding of land in the Hubbard Reservoir basin. After a court trial on McKay’s claims the district court awarded damages to McKay and issued a permanent injunction. This Court reverses the trial court’s permanent injunction, vacates the award of damages to McKay, and remands for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Sherwood v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Chubbuck v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Bondy v. LevyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jerry Machado v. Charles L. RyanIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Leer v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- Coward v. HadleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Morgan v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Idaho Development, LLC v. Teton View Golf Estates, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.