Legal Opinion

Legislature v. Reinecke

California Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1973No. Docket Nos. Sac. 7917, 7919, 7923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

In these cases we retained jurisdiction to draft new legislative and congressional reapportionment plans for the elections of 1974 through 1980 in the event that the Legislature did not enact valid reapportionment statutes in 1972. (Legislature v. Reinecke (1972) 6 Cal.3d 595, 604 [99 Cal.Rptr. 481, 492 P.2d 385] as modified (1972) 7 Cal.3d 92, 93 [101 Cal.Rptr. 552, 496 P.2d 464].) Since the Legislature did not enact such statutes in 1972 and since we lack any assurance that the Legislature will enact reapportionment measures in time for the 1974 elections, it is now…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Legislature v. ReineckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Legislature v. ReineckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Terrazas v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Legislature v. ReineckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Wilson v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Brooks v. HobbieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API