Legal Opinion

People v. Fritz

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1970No. Crim. 8352PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

Defendant John Fritz was convicted after a trial to the court of furnishing to another a restricted dangerous drug, to wit, phenobarbital, a violation of Health and Safety Code section 11912. He appeals from the judgment thereafter entered.

Because of the contentions made by Fritz we deem it proper to reiterate rules binding on an appellate court on review of a judgment against a defendant convicted of crime. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence an appellate court “ ‘must assume in favor of the verdict the existence of every fact that the [trier of fact] could…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. In Re BushmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. SurpliceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. TuggleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. State v. SwainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API