Ung Wo Sang Co. v. Alo

Opinion of the Court, by

McCully, J.

Counsel for the plaintiff moves the Court to hear a re-argument on the bill.

In Kenway vs. Notley, 5 Hawn., 123, on a motion for re-argument, the Court cites and adopts the rule of the N. Y. Court of *307Appeals in Mount vs. Mitchell, 32 N. Y., 702, in these words: “Motions for re-argument should be founded on papers showing clearly that some question decisive of the case, and duly submitted by counsel, has been overlooked by the Court, or that the decision is in conflict with an express statute, or with a controlling decision, to which the attention of the Court…