Legal Opinion

In re Lewers & Cooke, Ltd.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1908PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Petition for Rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BALLOU, J.

The’petitioner’s petition for a rehearing of the decision in this case (In re Lewers & Cooke, Ltd., 18 Haw. 625), contained the usual averments that the decision was in conflict with an express statute and with controlling decisions and that questions decisive of the case and duly submitted were overlooked by the court, but upon oral argument upon the petition the argument was devoted almost wholly to a restatement and reargument of the case in general. .A case thus presented is naturally stronger than when counsel have not the advantage of an opinion of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Rector v. GibbonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Gay v. ParpartSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Janesville Cotton MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Meader v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kam Chin Chun Ming v. Kam Hee HoHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Lewers & Cooke, Ltd. v. AtcherlySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. State v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd. v. AtcherleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd. v. AtcherleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API