G. Fruge Junk Co. v. City of Oakland
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
SCHWARZER, District Judge.
All defendants move for summary judgment on this complaint which attacks defendant Cities’ exclusive franchising ordinances for solid waste handling and action taken under them by defendant franchisee. Because there is neither legal nor factual support for any of plaintiff’s claims, and no material facts are in dispute, the motion must be granted.
Facts
Plaintiff is a sole proprietorship engaged in the business of hauling, segregating, and recycling solid waste, and operating a recycling plant in Hayward, California. It brings this action…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In Re Airport Car Rental Antitrust Litigation. Budget Rent-A-Car of Washington-Oregon, Inc. v. The Hertz Corp. And National Car Rental System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Tom Hudson & Associates, Inc., and Tom Hudson v. City of Chula Vista, Sca Services Inc., and Chula Vista Sanitary Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Garden Grove Sanitary District v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- Professional Engineers v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Salomon S.A. v. Alpina Sports Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1990