In Re Airport Car Rental Antitrust Litigation. Budget Rent-A-Car of Washington-Oregon, Inc. v. The Hertz Corp. And National Car Rental System, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal requires us to decide whether the so-called Noerr-Pennington exemption from the antitrust laws protects concerted efforts to lobby public officials who operate state-owned airports. We, as did the district court, conclude that it does.
I. Facts
A number of relatively small car-rental companies sued The Hertz Corp., Avis Rent A Car Systems, Inc., and National Car Rental Systems, Inc., on the ground that these industry giants had engaged in a nationwide conspiracy to monopolize the lucrative on-airport car-rental market. The lawsuits were consolidated into a single…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Sheldon P. KOTTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Greenwood Utilities Commission v. Mississippi Power Company, Greenwood Utilities Commission v. Mississippi Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Doron Precision Systems, Inc. v. FAAC, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.