Legal Opinion

Shesko v. City of Coatesville

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 2003No. 2:01-cv-06780PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, City of Coatesville. Plaintiff asserts claims of gender discrimination against Defendant under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) et seq., and under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 951 et seq. 1 Plaintiff alleges she was denied a promotion, subject to a sexually hostile environment, and generally treated adversely because of her gender. Though Defendant moves for summary judgment on all of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LaRochelle v. Wilmac Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Stevenson v. Pennsylvania State PoliceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API