Legal Opinion
Frame v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 1992No. 20A03-9108-CR-263PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
Richard Frame appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI), a Class D felony by virtue of Frame's prior DWI conviction.1 As his sole allegation of error, Frame contends that the trial court improperly enhanced his conviction because he was not represented by counsel at the proceeding on the earlier DWI charge.
We affirm.
On May 23, 1990, the State filed a charge of DWI against Frame, alleging that he was previously convicted for DWI occurring on or about March 27, 1989. In the earlier proceeding, Frame was not represented by counsel and pled guilty to misdemeanor…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harvey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Morphew v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996