Legal Opinion

Morphew v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1996No. 41A05-9601-CR-31PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.

Daniel Morphew appeals his convictions for driving a motor vehicle while suspended as an habitual traffic offender, a class D felony, operating while intoxicated ("OWI"), a class A misdemeanor, and an habitual substance offender enhancement on the OWI, a class D felony. Morphew raises three issues for our review, which we restate as:(1) whether the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction for driving while suspended as an habitual traffic offender;(2) whether the trial court erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the amended information for the habitual…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Freeman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Haymaker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Washington v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. FahertyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  3. U-Haul Co. of Indiana v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2008
  4. Hollingsworth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. King v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API