Legal Opinion

United States v. Marc Enright Neilson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1973No. 72-2292PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENFREW, District Judge:

Appellant was convicted in a jury trial of knowingly failing and neglecting to keep his Local Board advised of the address where mail would reach him from July 17, 1970, until December 1, 1970, in violation of 50 U.S.C.App. § 462. The trial court granted five years’ probation on the condition appellant obtain a job for three years doing work in the national interest. This appeal raises questions in two general areas, the exclusion of certain evidence and the adequacy of the instructions to the jury.

Appellant registered with Local Board No. 80, Santa Barbara,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. J. A. Herzog v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. David Seymour Graves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. George AnchetaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Victor PetrucciCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. Bruce Pollock v. Koehring Company, a Corporation, Industrial Indemnity Company, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Koehring Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Charles Cary ChudyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. State v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API