Legal Opinion

Bagley v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 13, 1916PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Replevin. Plea, tbe general issue. Trial by jury at tbe June Term, Windsor County, Slack, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

This is an action of replevin. Trial by jury was had and verdict and judgment were for the defendant; whereupon the court ordered the return to the defendant of the property replevied. The plaintiff brings exceptions.

In the beginning of the preliminary statement of the case, made in the bill of exceptions, the presiding judge says: ‘ ‘ The case was tried by both parties upon the theory that the defendant had a lien on said property for the storage charges, and that her right to retain possession of said property at the time this suit was brought depended upon whether the charges for storage…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  2. McKinstry v. CollinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1904
  3. Manley Bros. v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  4. German v. Bennington & Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
  5. Central Vermont Railroad v. Town of RoyaltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  2. Cummings v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  3. French v. WheldonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  4. MacDonald, B.N.F. v. OrtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  5. Edmunds Bros. v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API