Edmunds Bros. v. Smith
Supreme Court of Vermont
Action op Tort. 'Plea, the general 'issue. Trial by jury at the March Term, 1920, Rutland County, Wilson, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Fish, Supr. J.
The plaintiffs are Thomas P. Edmunds and William Edmunds, copartners doing business as Edmunds *398Brothers. The defendants are F. G-. Smith, Burton F. Smith, Warren E. Smith, and Charles G-. Noyes. Three of them are directors of the Smith Lumber Company, and the fourth was acting under their directions at the time of the injuries 'complained of. They are sued individually for damages claimed to have been suffered by the plaintiffs because of the alleged unlawful acts of the defendants in securing possession of a certain pool room in Fair Haven, and jn keeping the possession of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bank of Middlebury v. Rutland & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
- Laurent v. VaughnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
- Trow v. ThomasSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898
- In re Estate of MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
- Moran v. Versailles Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Paska v. SaundersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Towle v. St. Albans Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- In Re Moxley's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- MacDonald, B.N.F. v. OrtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- L'ECUYER v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.