Legal Opinion

Osborn v. Leach.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 27, 1904PublishedCited by 68 opinions

ActioN by W. H. Osborn against M. T. Leach and the News and Observer Publishing Company, beard by Judge O. H. Allen and a jury, at December Term, 1903, of the Superior Oourt of Guileoed County. From a judgment for the defendants the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Busbee Busbee and Brooks Thompson for defendant News and ObserverPublishing Company. This is an action for libel against M. T. Leach and the News and Observer Publishing Company. Judgment by default for want of an answer and inquiry had been taken against the defendant Leach. 132 N.C. 1149; S. c., 133 N.C. 27. In the trial upon the merits, at the close of the plaintiff's evidence the defendant Leach moved to dismiss "upon the ground that the newspaper article alleged to be libelous was not libelous, and that the plaintiff had not alleged a cause of action." The Court being of that opinion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Park v. Detroit Free Press Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Allen v. Pioneer-Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Hanson v. KrehbielSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Ramsey v. . CheekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Wallace v. Western N. C. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Greensboro News Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Ross v. GoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  5. Ludwig v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API