Legal Opinion

Mossholder v. Wiggins

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1941No. 3220PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

The above entitled cause is now being determined by reason of plaintiff’s appeal on questions of law and fact from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio.

The cause is being heard de novo on the same evidence submitted before the trial court.

Counsel for appellant in his brief indicates that he is presenting an error proceeding, since on page 2 of the brief he sets -out the assignment of errors. However, the transcript of evidence is not signed and allowed as a Bill of Exceptions.

In our determination it will make very little difference whether we…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alexander v. CronOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hipsher v. HunterOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Mayse v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API