Legal Opinion

United States v. Moscahlades Bros.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 28, 1919No. 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 42138. [Oral argument Nov. 6,1918, by Mr. Hanson.]

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

This case involves the application of paragraph X of section 3 of the tariff act of 1913 as relates to olives in brine and dried figs damaged or destroyed, as hereinafter set forth.

The facts are shown by the following extracts from the testimony introduced on behalf of the importers, which is undisputed.

They entered some 315 barrels of ripe olives in brine, a number of cases of dried figs, and a quantity of prepared vegetables at the port of New York December 11, 1915. A member of the importers’ firm visited the vessel which brought the merchandise three or four days after she arrived at her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Houlder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moscahlades Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Costogue v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Bing Kee & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  4. Poole Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API