Re Enright
Supreme Court of Vermont
Proceedings for disbarment. Heard upon the report of a committee. The opinion states the facts.
1Per curiam
Mr. Enright is a duly admitted and sworn attorney of this court and under the law by virtue thereof, entitled to practice in the other courts of the state. As such attorney, he brought a suit in favor of Matthew Bingham against the Phoenix Insurance Company, of New York. Mr. E. R. Hard was the attorney for the insurance company, and Mr. U. C. Crosby its agent. Subsequently Mr. Bingham died, and Mr. Enright and Mr. Dodds were *352duly appointed executors of Mr. Bingham’s will, andas such entered to prosecute the suit. Mr. Enright continued to act as attorney for the plaintiffs, but, some…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex. rel. Wolfe v. KirkeSupreme Court of Florida · 1868
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- In Re HaddadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- In re EnrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
- State v. LegendreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
- In Re MonaghanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.