Zuschek v. Whitmoyer Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRODERICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this suit for defamation against defendants Whitmoyer Laboratories, Inc., Rohm and Haas and William P. Ambrogi. A jury trial commenced on March 28,1977. After the plaintiff advised the Court that plaintiff had concluded the presentation of evidence as to liability, the defendant moved for a directed verdict pursuant to Rule 50. The parties argued the Rule 50 motion and the Court granted the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. This memorandum is intended to set forth the grounds upon which the Court directed a verdict for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baird v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Dempsky v. DoubleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Harbridge v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
3Cited by13 opinions
- Geyer v. SteinbronnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Sigal Construction Corp. v. StanburyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Happy 40, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Garvey v. Dickinson CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Frymire v. PaineWebber, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.