Legal Opinion

Dempsky v. Double

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1956No. Appeal, 19PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,

In this libel action the trial court entered a compulsory nonsuit which was affirmed by the court en banc, and piaintiff_.appeals.

In May, 1950, a so-called “free-work probe” was being conducted in the City of Pittsburgh. It consisted of an investigation into the possible misuse' of public property by local officials, especially the use of county vehicles by county employees for private purposes, and it was much publicized at the time in the newspapers.

On May 9, 1950, one of the defendants, Esther Smith, wrote a letter to the Controller of Allegheny…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matson v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Sarkees v. Warner-West Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Conroy v. Pittsburgh TimesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Neeb v. HopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  5. Naulty v. Bulletin Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Beckman v. DunnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. American Future Systems, Inc. v. Better Business BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Sciandra v. LynettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Baird v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API