Legal Opinion

Questa Resources, Inc. v. Stott

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 2003No. 20020267PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Larry Young (“Young”) appealed a summary judgment foreclosing a mortgage on property located in Burleigh County, North Dakota. We conclude the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to Questa Resources, Inc., d/b/a Questa Mortgage, and First National Acceptance Company of North America (collectively referred to as “Questa”). We affirm the judgment of the trial court, and we award costs, including reasonable attorney fees, in favor of Questa and against Young in the amount of $1500 under Rule 38, N.D.RApp.P.

I

[¶ 2] In July 1998, Valley Honey Company and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wenzel v. WenzelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mitchell v. PreusseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Riemers v. O'HALLORANNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bjerklie v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Alerus Financial, N.A. v. LambNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hilgers v. HilgersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API