Legal Opinion
United States v. Weisz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 13, 1996No. 94 Civ. 6672 (CSH)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:
This action requires the Court to consider the scope of the federal Fair Housing Act, as amended (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq., within the context of acrimonious disputes between neighbors in a Rockland County town.
Defendant Pearl Weisz resides at 26 South Parker Drive in the Town of Ramapo, Rock-land County. The residence across the street at 27 South Parker Drive is inhabited by John and Carol Cronin and their three children, Sean, Bruce, and Suzanne (now Suzanne Cronin Hammond) (hereinafter “the Cronins”). Following a complaint…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., Northwest Opportunity Center and Eluteria D. Maldonado, Intervening v. Village of Arlington HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Ricciuti v. Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Matthew Madonna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Laufman v. Oakley Bldg. & Loan Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1976
- Stackhouse v. DeSitterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Favourite v. 55 Halley St., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Lawrence v. Courtyards at Deerwood Ass'n, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Ohana v. 180 Prospect Place Realty Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Logan v. MatveevskiiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Gourlay v. Forest Lake Estates Civic Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.