Legal Opinion

Ohana v. 180 Prospect Place Realty Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 11, 1998No. 1:94-cv-05816PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BLOCK, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Tami Ohana and Edith Stem, pro se, commenced this action against, inter alia, Ruth Jackson (“Jackson”) and Gloria Phelps (“Phelps”), seeking monetary damages against these defendants for their alleged interference with plaintiffs’ rights under § 3617 of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. (“FHA”), and an implementing regulation, 24 C.F.R. § 100.400. Presently before the Court aré Jackson’s and Phelps’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint, as amended, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), for failure to state a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Robyn Halprin and Rick Halprin v. The Prairie Single Family Homes of Dearborn Park AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Haber v. ASN 50th St. LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Egan v. SchmockDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
  4. Gourlay v. Forest Lake Estates Civic Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
  5. Mohamed v. McLaurinDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API