Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Denckla

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 19, 1956PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

100 So.2d 378 (1956)

Elizabeth Donner HANSON, Individually and as executrix, et al., Appellants,

v.

Katherine N.R. DENCKLA, Individually, et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

September 19, 1956.

Caldwell, Pacetti, Robinson & Foster and Manley P. Caldwell, West Palm Beach, and William H. Foulk, Wilmington, Del., for Elizabeth Donner Hanson, Individually, as Executrix of the Will of Dora Browning Donner, Deceased, as Guardian Ad Litem for Joseph Donner Winsor and Donner Hanson and William Donner Roosevelt, Individually; McCarthy, Lane & Adams and Edward McCarthy,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bullen v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Graves v. SchmidlappSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Wilmington Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1942
  4. Bullen v. State of WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Shapley TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Grobark v. Addo MacHine Co., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Zuckerman v. AlterSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Lewis v. HansonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  5. Bartlett v. DumaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API