Legal Opinion

Mann v. City of Hot Springs

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 23, 1961No. 5-2441PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

This appeal challenges a judgment of the Garland Circuit Court which annexed to the City of Hot Springs the adjacent territory here involved. The appellants, Sherman Mann and others, are residents of the territory sought to be annexed and have, all the time, most energetically opposed the annexation.

At the General Election in November 1959, there was submitted to the electors of the City of Hot Springs. (hereinafter called “The City”) the question of annexing the territory here involved, containing in excess of 700 acres all located south and west of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Dodson v. Mayor & Town CouncilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  3. Burton v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. City of Little Rock v. FindleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. Marsh v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holmes v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. City of Crossett v. AnthonySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. City of Saginaw v. Saginaw County Board of SupervisorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Planque v. City of Eureka SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. Faucett v. City of AtkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API