Legal Opinion

Marsh v. City of El Dorado

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 1950No. 4-9320PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

April 5, 1949, the electorate of the City of El Dorado, by proper procedure (Ark. Stats. 1947, § 19-307) voted to annex certain contiguous territory. 1,014 voted for annexation and 277 against. Thereafter, August 17th, the City petitioned the County Court to make the order of annexation. September 21st, appellants, as Remonstrants, appeared in the County Court, and after a hearing, the Court denied the City’s petition for annexation. On appeal by the City to the Circuit Court, there was a finding in favor of annexation in accordance with the City’s petition, and judgment accordingly.

This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Batesville v. BallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Dodson v. Mayor & Town CouncilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  4. Burton v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  5. City of Newport v. OwensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Crossett v. AnthonySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Garner v. BensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  3. Mann v. City of Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Louallen v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  5. Planque v. City of Eureka SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API