Legal Opinion
Marshall v. the City of Aspen
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 11, 1994No. 93CA1001PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MARQUEZ.
Plaintiff, Ronnie Marshall, appeals a judgment entered in favor of defendants, City of Aspen and Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, dismissing her complaint filed pursuant to C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) and granting an injunction ordering the cessation of use of a spa and deck and its removal from her property. We reverse the dismissal, vacate the injunction, and remand with directions.
In the spring of 1990, plaintiff constructed a spa/deck in her back yard, located above Hallam Lake in Aspen, Colorado, without first obtaining the proper permits. On May 31, 1990, the City…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Advertising Company v. The City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- City and County of Denver v. Denver Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners v. Colorado Mined Land Reclamation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Danielson v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Commerce CitySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Fedder v. McCurdyColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Aspen v. MarshallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996